It brings the viewer into the warehouse, shows the happy workers (how can you. The featured video on Georgia Expo’s YouTube channel, above, checks off all the requisite boxes for a promotional video about a company’s dedication to U.S. The Federal Circuit reversed, entered judgement in favour of Versa Top and remanded for further proceedings. FTC brings the curtain down on pipe and drape kit maker's misleading Made in the USA claims. Georgia Expo admitted that it included a picture and reference of Versa Top’s trademarked product names. The Federal Circuit stated that use of Versa Top’s mark in Expo's advertising and brochure name because a likelihood of confusion and that violates the Trademark Act. The Federal Circuit found that the District Court’s decision was contrary to precedent because it incorrectly applied the “use in commerce” definition. Established in 1986, Georgia Expo provides a complete line of pipe, drape and pipe and drape stand event equipment. pipe and drape rentals sandy springs, step and repeat rentals Brand: Georgia Expo, Other. S 1125 (a) (Section 43a of the Lanham Act) but The Court held that Georgia Expo's activities do not meet the expectations of “use of Commerce” and therefore rejected Versa Top’s request for an injunction. Freeman is a leading global event agency offering a complete solution for exhibitors, corporate events and trade shows. We offer full-service event and party rentals in Atlanta, GA. Versa Top argued that Georgia Expo has violated the Trademark Act at 14 U.S.C. The District Court found that Versa Top owns the Trademark PIPE AND DRAPE and Georgia Expo had not affixed the Versa Top Trademark to goods sold and transported in commerce. On April 19th 2019 in the Appeal Case before the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, The Federal Circuit analysed points with citations. Section 43 of the Act narrates on misleading description, the likelihood of confusion of goods rendered in service. When the mark used or displayed in the sale or advertising of services are rendered in commerce, then it is said to be “use in commerce”. Under section 45, the term used in commerce means the bonafide use of a mark in the ordinary course of trade, and not made merely to reserve a right in a mark. The case revolves around Section 43 and 45 of the Lanham Act. Next Versa Top filed an appeal against the judgement of The District Court. The District Court held that as Georgia Expo had not affixed the Versa Top Trademark to goods sold or transported in commerce, so Expo cannot be liable for Trademark infringement. The District Court granted Georgia Expo motion for summary judgement. Versa Top filed a complaint against Georgia Expo for Trademark infringement. Georgia Expo distributed advertising and brochures containing Versa Top's Trademarks and pictures of a Versa Top product. Versa Top and Georgia Expo produce and sell systems of modular rod and pole structures. Court of Appeals for the ninth circuit against the summary Judgement of The District Court. Versa Top filed a notice of appeal to the U.S. Justice BN Srikrishna Report on Institutionalisation of Arbitration.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |